Re: [PATCH 1/5] libata: make SCR access ops per-link

[Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>]

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Logically, SCR access ops should take @link; however, there was no
> compelling reason to convert all SCR access ops when adding @link
> abstraction as there's one-to-one mapping between a port and a non-PMP
> link.  However, that assumption won't hold anymore with the scheduled
> addition of slave link.
> 
> Make SCR access ops per-link.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/ahci.c            |   24 ++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/ata/ata_piix.c        |   15 +++++++++++----
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c     |   13 ++++---------
>  drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c        |   26 +++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/ata/sata_inic162x.c   |    8 ++++----
>  drivers/ata/sata_mv.c         |   28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/ata/sata_nv.c         |   16 ++++++++--------
>  drivers/ata/sata_promise.c    |   16 +++++++++-------
>  drivers/ata/sata_qstor.c      |   12 ++++++------
>  drivers/ata/sata_sil.c        |   16 ++++++++--------
>  drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c      |   12 ++++++------
>  drivers/ata/sata_sis.c        |   28 ++++++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/ata/sata_svw.c        |   10 ++++++----
>  drivers/ata/sata_uli.c        |   24 ++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/ata/sata_via.c        |   24 ++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/ata/sata_vsc.c        |   10 ++++++----
>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c |    8 ++++----
>  include/linux/libata.h        |    4 ++--
>  18 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)

applied 1-5