From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkMVO-0003Hz-Qr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:25:54 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KkMVK-0003GC-TJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:25:54 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42372 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KkMVK-0003G0-D4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:25:50 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:35923) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KkMVF-0005ys-H1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:25:50 -0400 Received: from anguille.univ-lyon1.fr ([134.214.4.207]) by hall.aurel32.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KkMTt-000603-2y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:24:21 +0200 Message-ID: <48E10F3F.4030900@aurel32.net> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:24:15 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] alpha: correctly defines TARGET_MAP_xx constants References: <20080918092158.GB9648@volta.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <20080918092158.GB9648@volta.aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:16:49AM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote: >> Hi, >> >> most of the TARGET_MAP_xx macros were wrong for alpha. This patch fixes >> it. >> Using this patch I was able to run an hello-world program (using printf) >> statically >> linked with an old glibc. >> >> I agree that the TARGET_MAP_xx definition block starts to be a mess. >> Maybe maintainers >> have strong opinions about that. >> > > I agree this starts to be a mess. I think we should duplicate a few > lines for values that are "common" to a few architectures only. > > Any other opinion? > I have applied a patch that duplicate those values to clean all the mess and to add alpha specific values. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net