From: Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com>
To: Olaf Meeuwissen <olaf.meeuwissen@avasys.jp>,
"lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Petrie, Glen" <glen.petrie@eitc.epson.com>,
printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] Slides for GSoC report on the PWG Meetingin October
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:50:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E282F2.1070206@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87od26wn8g.fsf@geek.avasys.jp>
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> Then a question. Is the SANE API really slated for inclusion in
>>> LSB-4.0? I've seen only very minimal discussion on the lsb-discuss
>>> list.
>> The problem is the missing manpower for writing specs and test suites.
>
> Could you be more specific about:
>
> - what kind of specs are required
> - what kind of test suites are required
> - how much time is approximately needed for each of these
> - the process involved to contribute these
>
Can someone of the LSB work group help Olaf here and post appropriate
documentation links, explain what to do, ...
> That would make it easier for me to see if/when/where I can provide
> some sorely missing manpower ;-)
>
>> As the printer manufacturers benefit most from these new requirements,
>> I think the best is to ask them for help.
>>
>> Olaf, would you, or someone of your co-workers at Avasys help here?
>
> I would like to help but it doesn't look like I'll be having any time
> until around the end of October (and even after that I'm not so sure
> I'll be having a lot of time).
LSB developers, what are the time frames for finishing specs and test
suites. Are they different for SANE, as SANE is planned to get into the
trial use category?
Till
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-30 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 14:56 [Printing-architecture] Slides for GSoC report on the PWG Meetingin October Petrie, Glen
2008-09-22 10:18 ` TORATANI Yasumasa
2008-09-26 14:19 ` Till Kamppeter
2008-09-26 16:12 ` Till Kamppeter
2008-09-29 0:33 ` Olaf Meeuwissen
2008-09-29 6:55 ` Till Kamppeter
2008-09-29 23:23 ` Olaf Meeuwissen
2008-09-30 19:50 ` Till Kamppeter [this message]
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0809301656300.6301@norris.e-artisan.org>
2008-10-01 0:23 ` [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] " Olaf Meeuwissen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-22 14:17 [Printing-architecture] " Petrie, Glen
2008-09-29 10:50 ` TORATANI Yasumasa
[not found] <fc.3b9aca000c29c9413b9aca0041c9290c.7032b4@stmargarets.school.nz>
2008-09-23 1:39 ` henri
2008-09-23 16:55 ` Ira McDonald
2008-09-24 8:35 ` TORATANI Yasumasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E282F2.1070206@gmail.com \
--to=till.kamppeter@gmail.com \
--cc=glen.petrie@eitc.epson.com \
--cc=lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=olaf.meeuwissen@avasys.jp \
--cc=printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.