From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <48E4F16B.5000309@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:06:03 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48E4EE00.5080409@domain.hid> <48E4EE52.2000202@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <48E4EE52.2000202@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] rt_task_set_priority vs. Linux priority List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai-core Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Quick question $customer stumbled over: Shouldn't the user space part of >> rt_task_set_priority also (or rather?) adjust the Linux priority of the >> caller? My impression is yes. Actually, translating the native priority >> to sched_setscheduler parameters and calling that service would be >> better, no? > > I believe Philippe already fixed that in trunk. Actually, this does not seem to be fixed in trunk. However, you should use pthread_setschedparam instead of sched_setscheduler: ISTR that sched_setscheduler sets the priorites of all threads. -- Gilles.