From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sedji Gaouaou Subject: Re: [PATCH]ASoC: Create a common directory for AVR32 and ARM9 atmel boards. Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:39:55 +0200 Message-ID: <48E62EBB.80603@atmel.com> References: <48E47D42.8080306@atmel.com> <20081002150731.GH2848@sirena.org.uk> <48E4F025.80907@atmel.com> <20081002181211.GA3345@sirena.org.uk> <48E613BB.6090003@atmel.com> <20081003131411.GC26035@sirena.org.uk> <48E62A89.8070803@atmel.com> <20081003143523.GE26035@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from atmel-es2.atmel.fr (mail.atmel.fr [81.80.104.162]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F442474A for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:40:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20081003143523.GE26035@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Geoffrey Wossum , Haavard Skinnemoen , Frank Mandarino List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Mark Brown a =E9crit : > OK, that's good. It'd be helpful if you could mention this in your > patch descriptions - at the minute there's very little detail there > which makes issues like this less clear than they could be. > = > I'd still like to see this tested at least somewhat on AVR32, just to > make sure. Even a build test would be good. > = For sure! I am currently writing a new set of patches, so I will add some comments = to improve readability. Anyway I agree we should wait for some avr guys to test it. BTW I would like to thank you for your time and consideration! Regards, Sedji