All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Ryan Harper <ryanh@us.ibm.com>
Cc: aliguori@linux.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] Reallocate dma buffers in read/write path if needed
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 07:29:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E850AD.8080904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081004214700.GH31395@us.ibm.com>

Ryan Harper wrote:
> I'd rather avoid any additional accounting overhead of a pool.

The accounting overhead is noise compared to copying hundreds of 
megabytes per second.


> If 4MB
> is a reasonable limit, lets make that the new max.  

The real max is the dma buffer size multiplied by the number of 
concurrent requests.  With a queue depth of 64, the buffers become 4 MB 
* 64 = 256 MB.  That can double the size of a small guest, and using 
just one disk, too.

> I can do some
> testing to see where we drop off on performance improvements.  We'd
> have a default buffer size (smaller than the previous 64, and now 128k
> buf size) that is used when we allocate scsi requests; scanning through
> send_command() provides a good idea of other scsi command buf usage; and
> on reads and writes, keep the capping logic we've had all along, but
> bump the max size up to something like 4MB -- or whatever tests results
> show as being ideal. 
>   

We know what the ideal is: dropping the scatter/gather buffer completely.

-- 
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-05  5:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-03 22:05 [PATCH 0/4] Improve emulated scsi write performance Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 22:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] lsi_queue_command: add dma direction parameter Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 22:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] Refactor lsi_do_command to queue read and write ops Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 22:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] Refactor scsi-disk layer for queue'ing writes Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 22:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] Reallocate dma buffers in read/write path if needed Ryan Harper
2008-10-03 23:17   ` [Qemu-devel] " Paul Brook
2008-10-03 23:35     ` Anthony Liguori
2008-10-04  0:00       ` Paul Brook
2008-10-04 10:00       ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]         ` <20081004135749.pphehrhuw9w4gwsc@imap.linux.ibm.com>
2008-10-04 21:47           ` [Qemu-devel] " Ryan Harper
2008-10-04 22:22             ` Anthony Liguori
2008-10-05  5:23               ` Avi Kivity
2008-10-05 23:06               ` Ryan Harper
2008-10-06  7:27                 ` Avi Kivity
2008-10-04 23:00             ` Paul Brook
2008-10-05  5:29             ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-10-05 23:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Improve emulated scsi write performance Ryan Harper
2008-10-13 16:15   ` Ryan Harper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48E850AD.8080904@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=ryanh@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.