From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KmPLO-0003Ai-Hb for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:52:02 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmPLM-00038u-5C for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:52:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmPLK-00037d-BZ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:51:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54641 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KmPLK-00037M-76 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:51:58 -0400 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:55449 helo=jenni1.inet.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KmPLJ-0007vg-D9 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:51:57 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (84.248.105.254) by jenni1.inet.fi (8.5.014) id 48DA2BD7009198D4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:51:56 +0300 Message-ID: <48E88038.6090201@nic.fi> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 11:52:08 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Vesa_J=E4=E4skel=E4inen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20080830235833.3b29b3c2@gamma.lan> <20081004214328.57e8f709@gibibit.com> In-Reply-To: <20081004214328.57e8f709@gibibit.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: [PATCH] GSoC #07 VBE double buffering (vs r1885) X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 08:52:00 -0000 Colin D Bennett wrote: > Clean patch against trunk SVN revision 1885. >=20 > Regards, > Colin Thanks for the re-base. In your opinion how should rendering of double buffered screen be different from single buffered? Eg. who is responsible to handle those differences? Thanks, Vesa J=E4=E4skel=E4inen