From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: net/netfilter reorganization
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:09:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E9E3DA.9020706@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810060916360.18011@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
>>> If restructuring is on the way, then it should cover all possible parts.
>>> Just my quick thoughts, with suggested module names:
>>> mark modules, targets in one module (route):
>>> connmark, mark, realm
>>> CLASSIFY, CONNMARK, MARK
>> CONNMARK and connmark needs to be separated from MARK etc. because
>> they depend on the conntrack module.
>
> They can go into a single file and linked to the "route" module iff
> NF_CONNTRACK was selected.
>
> The same may be applied for other cases as well: it is not needed to force
> everything into a huge file. ;-)
But then we still have the individual files in the directory.
I don't think we should combine files based on config options
but by actually moving the code into a new file.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-05 12:34 RFC: net/netfilter reorganization Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 13:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 14:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 14:35 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 14:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 16:02 ` David Miller
2008-10-05 16:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 16:15 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 16:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 16:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 16:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 19:06 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2008-10-05 20:28 ` David Miller
2008-10-05 20:33 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 20:48 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 21:42 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2008-10-05 22:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-05 23:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-06 10:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-07 1:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-07 11:34 ` Roman Zippel
2008-10-07 15:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-07 17:09 ` Roman Zippel
2008-10-07 17:44 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-13 18:52 ` Roman Zippel
2008-10-17 14:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-06 7:23 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2008-10-06 10:09 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-10-05 16:17 ` David Miller
2008-10-05 16:22 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-06 16:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-10-05 21:51 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E9E3DA.9020706@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.