From: Steven Toth <stoth@linuxtv.org>
To: Devin Heitmueller <devin.heitmueller@gmail.com>
Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Unreliable tuning with HVR-950q
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:57:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EA3555.6060104@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412bdbff0810060853k6925b37ax6801943d6b31bf61@mail.gmail.com>
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> Hello Steven,
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Steven Toth <stoth@linuxtv.org> wrote:
>>> Does anybody else have a 950q? Does it work? To me, it appears that
>>> either its tuner is junk or the Linux driver needs some work. I guess
>>> my next step is to set up a Windows machine and try it there.
>> We _do_ have rock solid HVR950q support for digital, on lots of platforms in
>> various locations.
>>
>> Based on the facts so far it's probably something specific to your stick,
>> your location or your testing. Try windows and report back if you can.
>
> Just an FYI: I'm actively debugging an issue with xc5000 signal lock
> that looks like some sort of timing issue. I found that some fixes I
> made in my local tree to optimize time to lock resulted in getting
> lock *much* faster in many cases, but failing entirely in others.
> When it works, I get lock in 330ms; when it fails I don't get lock
> even when polling the demod at 100ms interval for 2 seconds.
>
> I'm doing this on a Pinnacle 801e (xc5000/s5h1411) and not a HVR-950q,
> but it's possible it's the same issue.
>
> Will report back when I have isolated the problem.
Good to know, thanks Devin.
- Steve
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 21:25 Unreliable tuning with HVR-950q Scott Bronson
2008-09-19 21:28 ` Devin Heitmueller
2008-09-20 3:05 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-20 5:55 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-20 6:37 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-21 20:16 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-22 2:28 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-22 19:06 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-22 19:22 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-23 6:35 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-23 15:14 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-26 16:52 ` Scott Bronson
2008-10-01 18:46 ` Scott Bronson
2008-10-06 15:43 ` Steven Toth
2008-10-06 15:53 ` Devin Heitmueller
2008-10-06 15:57 ` Steven Toth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48EA3555.6060104@linuxtv.org \
--to=stoth@linuxtv.org \
--cc=devin.heitmueller@gmail.com \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.