From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from venus.billgatliff.com (venus.billgatliff.com [209.251.101.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3625BDE443 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:04:30 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <48EF60F2.2050403@billgatliff.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:04:34 -0500 From: Bill Gatliff MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API References: <1223608819.8157.127.camel@pasglop> <48EED4D1.2040506@billgatliff.com> <1223614943.8157.158.camel@pasglop> <9e4733910810092206r5ba516ddv3d3ec910634431f5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e4733910810092206r5ba516ddv3d3ec910634431f5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jon Smirl wrote: > What do the device tree deities have to say about PWM support? Dunno. What lists are they on? :) b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@billgatliff.com