From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from venus.billgatliff.com (venus.billgatliff.com [209.251.101.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB457DE617 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:07:23 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <48EF61A2.3020006@billgatliff.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:07:30 -0500 From: Bill Gatliff MIME-Version: 1.0 To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/6] [PWM] Generic PWM API implementation References: <4b5c3aa2b1bc2b7efad834da49c2dec8c0a8726b.1223482372.git.bgat@billgatliff.com> <1223608853.8157.129.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1223608853.8157.129.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:43 -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Bill Gatliff >> --- > > And you haven't provided -any- changeset comment. That isn't good :-) What's the easiest way to do that with git? I'm using git-format-patch and git-send-email to produce the changeset emails themselves, after extensive use of git-add --interactive and git-rebase --interactive to get rid of the "mundane" commit stuff that I do because of my highly interrupt-driven workflow. Should I just edit the files that come out of git-format-patch? b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat@billgatliff.com