From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.226]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80DADDD0B for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:33:02 +1100 (EST) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c48so687220wra.1 for ; Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48F161D4.90003@genesi-usa.com> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:32:52 -0500 From: Matt Sealey MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API References: <1223608819.8157.127.camel@pasglop> <48EED4D1.2040506@billgatliff.com> <1223614943.8157.158.camel@pasglop> <9e4733910810092206r5ba516ddv3d3ec910634431f5@mail.gmail.com> <48EF60F2.2050403@billgatliff.com> <1223671514.4889.6.camel@ld0161-tx32> In-Reply-To: <1223671514.4889.6.camel@ld0161-tx32> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: Matt Sealey Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , Bill Gatliff List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:04 -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: >> Jon Smirl wrote: >> >>> What do the device tree deities have to say about PWM support? >> Dunno. What lists are they on? :) >> > > Perhaps devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org too. I thought this was what ePAPR was for. Why would it need all that discussion if it's being codified into a proper standard? Someone should just submit a reasonable extension to a reasonable extension-managing body :) -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations