From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: ACPI Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:30:46 +0200 Message-ID: <48F1EDF6.2050501@redhat.com> References: <889167.69127.qm@web35803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM List To: jdsw2002@yahoo.com Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:45429 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751867AbYJLMau (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:30:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <889167.69127.qm@web35803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: jd wrote: > Hi > We ship some images (that kicks the install ) out of the box and would like to know peoples experiences and developer opinions on ACPI. This would help us determine if this should be enabled by default or not. > > -- For Windows guests > -- For Linix guests > > I recommend you enable ACPI for all guests. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function