From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <48F35470.70600@domain.hid>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:00:16 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <48F34E5A.60209@domain.hid> <48F3527E.6020908@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <48F3527E.6020908@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG?] mem leak on slab size-1024 with Xenomai
 processes
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: rpm@xenomai.org
Cc: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>, xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Sigh, this is not my day: Can anyone confirm that we are leaking memory
>> with current SVN head? I'm seeing a constant increase on slab
>> "size-1024" on a x86_64 box when running arbitrary Xenomai apps in a loop.
>>
>> [ Besides that, I have an occasional deadlock in xnpipe_wakeup_proc due
>> to an inconsistent xnpipe_sleepq - likely a different story... :-/ ]
>>
> 
> Any luck with CONFIG_XENOMAI_OPT_DEBUG_QUEUES on?

As usual no luck: the bug disappeared (likely some race). Will dig into
that next after fixing this leak:

xnshadow_sys_event()
XNSHADOW_CLIENT_ATTACH -> xnarch_alloc_host_mem(xnsys_ppd)
XNSHADOW_CLIENT_DETACH -> ???

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux