From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] [PATCH] remove module dependency between ctnetlink and nf_nat Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:11:23 +0200 Message-ID: <48F3570B.2090209@trash.net> References: <20081011152116.6436.17277.stgit@Decadence> <20081011152312.6436.15322.stgit@Decadence> <48F3520B.7010306@trash.net> <48F355EA.7050104@netfilter.org> <48F35647.1010407@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:37850 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752231AbYJMOLZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:11:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48F35647.1010407@netfilter.org> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >> Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> Do you want me to apply the patch as attached to this email, or would >>> you prefer to rediff it? >> No, I'll send you a new patchset once you set your tree. This patch also >> needs to include the nfnl_lock/nfnl_unlock logic. > > Oh, I see, since you want to put this into 2.6.27, I'll see you a patch > for the NAT issue asap and keep the other in the internal queue. Great, thanks a lot.