Re: [PATCH 1/4] seq_file: don't call bitmap_scnprintf_len()

[Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>]

Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 05:29:17PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> "m->count + len < m->size" is true commonly, so bitmap_scnprintf()
>>> is commonly called. this fix saves a call to bitmap_scnprintf_len().
>> This saves a call if seq buffer is already full which is not a common
>> situation, so you're optimising for rare situations and adding branch
>> for common ones.
> 
> Hi Alexey
> 
> I think this saves a call if seq buffer is _not_ full after called.
> 
> since calling bitmap_scnprintf() is the common situation. so we use
> the return value of bitmap_scnprintf() instead of bitmap_scnprintf_len().
> 
> In old code bitmap_scnprintf_len() and bitmap_scnprintf() must be called
> commonly.
> 
> Thanks Lai.

Hi, Alexey,

Have noticed this comment? I hold my ground, ;-)
And seq_cpumask_list(), seq_nodemask_list() are needed for print mask
safely, Should I send independent patches for them if we can't
make an agreement about this fix.

Lai

> 
>>> --- a/fs/seq_file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/seq_file.c
>>> @@ -452,17 +452,18 @@ int seq_dentry(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *dentry, char *esc)
>>>  
>>>  int seq_bitmap(struct seq_file *m, unsigned long *bits, unsigned int nr_bits)
>>>  {
>>> -	size_t len = bitmap_scnprintf_len(nr_bits);
>>> -
>>> -	if (m->count + len < m->size) {
>>> -		bitmap_scnprintf(m->buf + m->count, m->size - m->count,
>>> -				 bits, nr_bits);
>>> -		m->count += len;
>>> -		return 0;
>>> +	if (m->count < m->size) {
>>> +		int len = bitmap_scnprintf(m->buf + m->count,
>>> +				m->size - m->count, bits, nr_bits);
>>> +		if (m->count + len < m->size) {
>>> +			m->count += len;
>>> +			return 0;
>>> +		}
>>>  	}
>>>  	m->count = m->size;
>>>  	return -1;
>>>  }
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_bitmap);
>> Modular users, where are they?
>>
>>
>>
> 
>