From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Linux support for hugepages as a
	Xen PV guest
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:31:03 -0700
Message-ID: <48F66F27.3060406@goop.org>
References: <C515195F.1E0C5%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
	<200810151201.06367.dcm@mccr.org> <48F66526.9050807@goop.org>
	<200810151712.26997.dcm@mccr.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <200810151712.26997.dcm@mccr.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Dave McCracken <dcm@mccr.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Dave McCracken wrote:
> I'm currently using xen-unstable and linux-2.6.18-xen as the base for my 
> development.  Are you saying I should move to the current Linux mainline 
> instead?
Yes.

>   Is linux-2.6.18-xen now obsolete?
>   

More or less.  Mainline is missing a few features, but it is stable and 
useful.  2.6.18-xen shouldn't be used for any new work.

    J