From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Ericsson Subject: Re: Git and tagging hook Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:04:52 +0200 Message-ID: <48F83914.8080508@op5.se> References: <1223268332.4072.7.camel@localhost> <48E9BB72.2080008@op5.se> <1223399613.20250.1.camel@localhost> <1223484445.4055.8.camel@localhost> <48ECF072.3000506@op5.se> <20081014172227.GB6931@efreet.light.src> <1224007401.4073.40.camel@localhost> <20081016201502.GA6362@efreet.light.src> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kristis Makris , Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Hudec X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 17 09:06:23 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KqjPX-0001QK-Md for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:06:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751152AbYJQHE7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:04:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751172AbYJQHE6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:04:58 -0400 Received: from mail.op5.se ([193.201.96.20]:32837 "EHLO mail.op5.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbYJQHE6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:04:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058C91B8005E; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:58:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.796 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.796 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.603, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.op5.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.op5.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fev86wzolheh; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:57:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from clix.int.op5.se (unknown [192.168.1.20]) by mail.op5.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78101B80053; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:57:55 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) In-Reply-To: <20081016201502.GA6362@efreet.light.src> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jan Hudec wrote: > As for people replacing their local commits, this is common especially in > Linux (and Git) development model. It's common everywhere where projects use peer review. Results 1 - 50 of about 14,600 for '"PATCH v2" vger.kernel.org' Results 1 - 50 of about 360,000 for "PATCH v2" So yes, it is a very common practice and anything interacting with a remote database based on each commit action will almost certainly be doing something wrong quite a lot of the time, especially since not all the patch-series end up being incorporated into a release anyway. The only sane integration point is the public watering-hole repository used for the project, and especially the release branch (or the "for-linus" branches around the world for sub-projects). -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231