From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: "Arno J. Klaassen" <arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11752] New: Extremely low netperf UDP_RR throughput for nvidia MCP65
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:05:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F8FE18.6060005@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wp63nrx7zk.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr>
Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>>Are netstat stats showing retransmissions during a TCP_STREAM test?
>
>
> some more info :
>
> [root@localhost mcp65]# uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.27-0.352.rc7.git1.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Sep 23 21:13:29 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
> [root@localhost ~]# ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:68:XXX
> inet addr:172.16.1.31 Bcast:172.16.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: XXX/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1731 errors:149 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:149
> TX packets:1628 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> RX bytes:2549871 (2.4 MiB) TX bytes:125378 (122.4 KiB)
> Interrupt:20 Base address:0x6000
>
> After some fiddling (essentially installing a netperf-rpm) :
>
> [root@localhost mcp65]# netstat -Ieth0
> Kernel Interface table
> Iface MTU Met RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR Flg
> eth0 1500 0 6347 508 0 0 5838 0 0 0 BMRU
>
>
> [root@localhost mcp65]# ethtool eth0
> Settings for eth0:
> Supported ports: [ MII ]
> Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
> Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
> Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
> 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
> 1000baseT/Full
> Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
> Speed: 1000Mb/s
> Duplex: Full
> Port: MII
> PHYAD: 1
> Transceiver: external
> Auto-negotiation: on
> Supports Wake-on: g
> Wake-on: d
> Link detected: yes
>
> [root@localhost mcp65]# netperf -v -t TCP_STREAM -H 172.16.1.7
> TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 172.16.1.7 (172.16.1.7) port 0 AF_INET
> 132.64
Hmm, I'm surprised that the lack of a value following the -v was
successful - I'll have to go back and look at the code :) Still, I
guess it gave you the desired "-v 0" behaviour.
> [root@localhost mcp65]# netstat -Ieth0
> Kernel Interface table
> Iface MTU Met RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVRFlg
> eth0 1500 0 84682 2933 0 0 127298 0 0 0BMRU
>
>
> I hope this is what you asked for ...
Close enough. I suspect that if you were to snap netstat -s -t before
and after the netperf you'd have seen retransmissions correlated to
those "RX-ERR" stats. My history is such that I don't think of netstat
for link-level stats and only think of it in the context of IP-layer and
higher (eg tcp).
Clearly something is fubar with the rx side (well duh :). The next set
of stats I'd try to look at would be ethtool stats for the interface, eg
ethtool -S eth0 and see if it shows someting more specific for the
"RX-ERR" shown by netstat -I eth0.
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-17 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-11752-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-10-16 20:49 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 11752] New: Extremely low netperf UDP_RR throughput for nvidia MCP65 Andrew Morton
2008-10-16 21:07 ` Rick Jones
2008-10-17 14:28 ` Arno J. Klaassen
2008-10-17 20:49 ` Arno J. Klaassen
2008-10-17 21:05 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2008-10-18 11:36 ` Arno J. Klaassen
2008-10-20 17:41 ` Rick Jones
2008-10-31 13:07 ` Arno J. Klaassen
2008-12-11 20:53 ` Arno J. Klaassen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F8FE18.6060005@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=aabdulla@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.