All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@suse.de>
To: "M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@superonline.com>
Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@novell.com>,
	Olaf Dabrunz <odabrunz@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FC38AE.3030007@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48FB6321.7030501@superonline.com>

M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
>> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 10:06 -0400, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> As you might guess from the subject line, since I started to use 2.6.27-rcX
>>> series, I began to get "irq 18: nobody cared" messages in dmesg. Currently I am
>>> using 2.6.27.2 with Sidux on this laptop, which is a Toshiba Satellite A100.
>>> I have reproduced this problem with vanilla and sidux's kernels.
>>>
>> Can you provide the contents of /proc/interrupts? 

Could you provide the following:
- output of lspci -nn
- dmesg output with kernel commandline option apic=debug

> My computer is currently in the "nobody cared" state. Here are the current
> contents of /proc/interrupts:
> 
> --- 8< ---
>            CPU0       CPU1       
>   0:   45249492      60399   IO-APIC-edge      timer
>   1:      25451          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>   8:          1          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc0
>   9:      36514          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
>  12:    1147983       2103   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>  14:     170245          0   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
>  15:     558085        819   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
>  16:        508          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb5, i915@pci:0000:00:02.0
>  17:       1353          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   firewire_ohci
>  18:     300158          1   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb4, tifm_7xx1, yenta
>  19:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb3
>  20:      26606          2   IO-APIC-fasteoi   eth0
>  22:    3206279          1   IO-APIC-fasteoi   HDA Intel
>  23:          3          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb1, ehci_hcd:usb2
> 220:    2105545          0   PCI-MSI-edge      iwl3945
> NMI:          0          0   Non-maskable interrupts
> LOC:    5971997   27874747   Local timer interrupts
> RES:     938710    1791498   Rescheduling interrupts
> CAL:     138135     180813   function call interrupts
> TLB:      48455      64413   TLB shootdowns
> TRM:          0          0   Thermal event interrupts
> SPU:          0          0   Spurious interrupts
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> --- >8 ---

Nothing unusual at first glance. How long did the system run?

> 
>> If you can reproduce the keyboard issue, it would be helpful to have the
>> above a few seconds before and after the device failure.
> 
> The keyboard issue happens every time I get the "nobody cared" message.
> 
> Unfortunately, this regression requires me to wait a long time before it shows itself.
> As I mentioned in my original e-mail, the "nobody cared" message appears at 3:00
> or 5:00 in the morning. However, I can write a cron job which saves the contents
> of /proc/interrupts every minute or so. If this would be helpful, please let me know.
> 
>>> Note 2: Another interesting thing which might be relevant is the following
>>> message which appears in dmesg some time after I boot:
>>>
>>> --- 8< ---
>>> hda-intel: IRQ timing workaround is activated for card #0. Suggest a bigger bdl_pos_adj.
>>> --- >8 ---
>>>
>> Is this card using IRQ 18?
> 
> It seems to use IRQ 22. I thought that there might be a connection, but it looks
> like it isn't relevant.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Sven
> 
> Thank you; I appreciate your help.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> M. Vefa Bicakci
> 

  Stefan

-- 
Stefan Assmann          | SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Software Engineer       | Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg
Mail : sassmann@suse.de | GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-20  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-19 14:06 Regression in 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100 M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-10-19 15:55 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2008-10-19 16:41   ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-10-20  7:52     ` Stefan Assmann [this message]
2008-10-20 22:08       ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-10-21 15:56         ` Stefan Assmann
2008-11-02 20:48           ` Update: "nobody " M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-11-03 15:34             ` Stefan Assmann
2008-11-09  5:32               ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2008-11-12  7:59                 ` Len Brown
2008-11-12  7:52             ` Len Brown
2008-10-20  0:27 ` Regression in 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody " Michal Jaegermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48FC38AE.3030007@suse.de \
    --to=sassmann@suse.de \
    --cc=bicave@superonline.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=odabrunz@suse.de \
    --cc=sdietrich@novell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.