From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] i386: highmem access assistancehypercalls Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:38:53 +0100 Message-ID: <48FD951D.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> References: <48F8CB2D.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> Keir Fraser 20.10.08 16:27 >>> >On 17/10/08 16:28, "Jan Beulich" wrote: > >> The hypervisor patch is below (using temporary numbers for the newly >> added sub-hypercalls), the Linux patch didn't change over the first >> submission (if the patch here is acceptable, I'll create a version >> that applies to the 2.6.18 tree). >>=20 >> Opinions? > >I'm fine in principle. A cursory glance at the substance of the patch >indicates that there are some secondary portions which could be discarded = or >broken out into separate patches: the constifying of unmap_domain_page*() >and the addition of FIX_HOLE to fixmap.h. Please divide up as appropriate >and re-send. Will do. One question I forgot to ask with the original mail: Should this functionality be announced via a new feature bit? Jan