[refpolicy] request for comments: policy for nufw and nuauth

[dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)]

Pierre Chifflier wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:57:49PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> You should never (almost never) have a gen_requires interface in a te file.
>>
>> You should use interfaces.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the review. I've re-written the policies from scratch, and
> trying to use interfaces and macros when available (files attached, this
> time not gzipped, to ease review).
>

Nothing attached.

>> files_pid_file(nuauth_var_run_t)
>> allow nuauth_t nuauth_var_run_t:dir { search write remove_name add_name };
>> allow nuauth_t nuauth_var_run_t:file { create write read getattr unlink };
>> allow nuauth_t nuauth_var_run_t:sock_file { unlink create write };
>>
>>
>> Should probably be something like
>>
>> manage_files_pattern(nuauth_t, nuauth_var_run_t, nuauth_var_run_t)
>> manage_sock_files_pattern(nuauth_t, nuauth_var_run_t, nuauth_var_run_t)
> 
> Fixed
> 
>>> allow nuauth_t etc_t:file { getattr read };
>> Should be
>> files_read_etc(nuauth_t)
> 
> This one does not seems to work. I had to add:
> 
> allow $1 nufw_etc_t:dir list_dir_perms;
> read_files_pattern($1,nufw_etc_t,nufw_etc_t)
> read_lnk_files_pattern($1,nufw_etc_t,nufw_etc_t)
> 
>>
>> # allow clients to connect
>> allow unconfined_t nuauth_port_t:tcp_socket recv_msg;
>> allow unconfined_t nuauth_port_t:tcp_socket name_connect;
>>
>> Not necessary. unconfined_t already can
corenet_port(nuauth_port_t)  if ports will be >= 1024
corenet_reserved_port(nuauth_port_t)  if ports will can be < 1024
corenet_rpc_port(nuauth_port_t)  if ports will can be bewtween 600 and 1024.


> Not here. Maybe it's related to the way I add the port ?
> I'm using:
> semanage port -a -t nuauth_port_t -p tcp 4129
> 
> Maybe there is a boolean to allow connections ?
> 
>>> allow nuauth_t bin_t:dir search;
>> corecmd_search_bin(nuauth_t)
>>
>>> allow nuauth_t postgresql_port_t:tcp_socket { name_connect send_msg
>> recv_msg };
>>
>> Look for corenetwork calls.
>>
> 
> Fixed
> 
> Thanks for your help !
> 
> Pierre
>