From: luferry <luferry@163.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>,
"Ming Lei" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] make blk_mq_map_queues more friendly for cpu topology
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:55:10 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48ca2186.fc76.169b8fef63a.Coremail.luferry@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190326073954.GD21617@lst.de>
At 2019-03-26 15:39:54, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>Why isn't this using the automatic PCI-level affinity assignment to
>start with?
When enable virtio-blk with multi queues but with only 2 msix-vector.
vp_dev->per_vq_vectors will be false, vp_get_vq_affintity will return NULL directly
so blk_mq_virtio_map_queues will fallback to blk_mq_map_queues.
448 const struct cpumask *vp_get_vq_affinity(struct virtio_device *vdev, int index)
449 {
450 struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
451
452 if (!vp_dev->per_vq_vectors ||
453 vp_dev->vqs[index]->msix_vector == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
454 return NULL;
455
456 return pci_irq_get_affinity(vp_dev->pci_dev,
457 vp_dev->vqs[index]->msix_vector);
458 }
32 int blk_mq_virtio_map_queues(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap,
33 struct virtio_device *vdev, int first_vec)
34 {
35 const struct cpumask *mask;
36 unsigned int queue, cpu;
37
38 if (!vdev->config->get_vq_affinity)
39 goto fallback;
40
41 for (queue = 0; queue < qmap->nr_queues; queue++) {
42 mask = vdev->config->get_vq_affinity(vdev, first_vec + queue); //vp_get_vq_affinity return NULL
43 if (!mask)
44 goto fallback;
45
46 for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
47 qmap->mq_map[cpu] = qmap->queue_offset + queue;
48 }
49
50 return 0;
51 fallback:
52 return blk_mq_map_queues(qmap);
53 }
here is previous discussion
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10865461/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-25 15:26 [PATCH] make blk_mq_map_queues more friendly for cpu topology luferry
2019-03-26 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-26 7:55 ` luferry [this message]
2019-03-27 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-27 9:17 ` luferry
2019-03-27 9:39 ` Dongli Zhang
2019-03-27 9:53 ` luferry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48ca2186.fc76.169b8fef63a.Coremail.luferry@163.com \
--to=luferry@163.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.