From: Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Henning Fehrmann <henning.fehrmann@aei.mpg.de>
Subject: Idle core on overloaded CPU?
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:12:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49006A30.7030208@aei.mpg.de> (raw)
Hi,
on Intel X3220 CPU based systems (4 physical cores) I came across the
following thing (Debian etch, with vanilla kernel 2.6.25.9):
starting the following:
$ screen -d -m stress -c 2
$ nice -19 screen -d -m stress -c 4
This causes two cores to be 100% busy in user state and one core to be
busy in 100% nice state. However, the remaining core is idle. Even
watching it over longer stretches of time, the situation remains static.
I guess it's a kernel misconfiguration on my part (config available here:
https://n0.aei.uni-hannover.de/linux/kernel/config-2.6.25.9-nodes
), but if not could this be a scheduling bug?
Thanks for any hint
Cheers
Carsten
reply other threads:[~2008-10-23 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49006A30.7030208@aei.mpg.de \
--to=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=henning.fehrmann@aei.mpg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.