From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KtOKL-0000Dh-Hr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:11:49 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KtOKK-0000D7-3c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:11:49 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54124 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KtOKJ-0000D4-Tv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:11:47 -0400
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.231]:53905)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1KtOKJ-00053L-Of
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:11:48 -0400
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c46so193826wra.18
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4901E5AC.6010906@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:11:40 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5524] Fix windows build after migration changes
References: <E1KtNOA-0007AN-7Z@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>	<4901D92C.8070800@bttr-software.de>	<4901DAE8.6080905@codemonkey.ws>
	<4901E355.8070306@bttr-software.de>
In-Reply-To: <4901E355.8070306@bttr-software.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Robert Riebisch wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>   
>> That would be great.  I don't know that we want to go on the current 
>> directory though.  There's a Windows API for finding Program Files.  
>> That's probably what we want to do.
>>     
>
> Why do you want to look for "Program Files" instead? Just let QEMU
> determine its own folder via GetModuleFileName() and look there for the
> BIOS files.
>   

That's not the same as CWD and is probably the right thing to do.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> One of the main advantages of QEMU over other virtualization products is
> that you can copy it to whatever folder you like. Even to a USB flash
> drive/memory key for complete portability.
>
> Robert Riebisch
>