From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:17:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail3.caviumnetworks.com ([12.108.191.235]:24995 "EHLO mail3.caviumnetworks.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S22314460AbYJXURL (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:17:11 +0100 Received: from exch4.caveonetworks.com (Not Verified[192.168.16.23]) by mail3.caviumnetworks.com with MailMarshal (v6,2,2,3503) id ; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:17:00 -0400 Received: from exch4.caveonetworks.com ([192.168.16.23]) by exch4.caveonetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:16:59 -0700 Received: from dd1.caveonetworks.com ([64.169.86.201]) by exch4.caveonetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:16:59 -0700 Message-ID: <49022D3A.90305@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:16:58 -0700 From: David Daney User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Tomaso Paoletti Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/37] Don't clobber spinlocks in 8250. References: <1224809821-5532-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1224809821-5532-30-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2008 20:16:59.0137 (UTC) FILETIME=[77F29710:01C93615] Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 20954 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com wrote: > >> From: David Daney >> >> In serial8250_isa_init_ports(), the port's lock is initialized. We >> should not overwrite it. Only copy in the fields we need. > > I suggest you to send all the 8250 patches to > linux-serial@vger.kernel.org and most probably the LKML. I don't think > the relevant maintainers read this list -- note that they will be the > general Linux maintainers as the serial subsystem doesn't have a dedicated > one at the moment. Please always consult the MAINTAINERS file before > posting patches (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches too). Thanks, we are aware of this. All the serial patches had been previously sent as you suggest. The next revision of this patch set will go to a wider audience, including linux-serial@ as appropriate. David Daney