From: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
To: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu>,
kenneth johansson <ken@kenjo.org>,
gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed git archive for bare repos
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:19:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49024A05.3090100@lsrfire.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224712023-5280-1-git-send-email-charles@hashpling.org>
Charles Bailey schrieb:
> This moves the call to git config to a place where it doesn't break
> the logic for using git archive in a bare repository but retains the
> fix to make git archive respect core.autocrlf.
If one combines your patch, Deskin's commit message and test and extends
on the latter a bit then I think we have a winner. :)
Here are a few more tests which create a ZIP file in addition to a tar
archive and compare them to their non-bare counterparts.
Care to resend?
Thanks,
René
t/t5000-tar-tree.sh | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
index e395ff4..bf5fa25 100755
--- a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
+++ b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
@@ -58,6 +58,11 @@ test_expect_success \
git commit-tree $treeid </dev/null)'
test_expect_success \
+ 'create bare clone' \
+ 'git clone --bare . bare.git &&
+ cp .gitattributes bare.git/info/attributes'
+
+test_expect_success \
'remove ignored file' \
'rm a/ignored'
@@ -74,6 +79,14 @@ test_expect_success \
'diff b.tar b2.tar'
test_expect_success \
+ 'git archive in a bare repo' \
+ '(cd bare.git && git archive HEAD) >b3.tar'
+
+test_expect_success \
+ 'git archive vs. the same in a bare repo' \
+ 'test_cmp b.tar b3.tar'
+
+test_expect_success \
'validate file modification time' \
'mkdir extract &&
"$TAR" xf b.tar -C extract a/a &&
@@ -151,6 +164,14 @@ test_expect_success \
'git archive --format=zip' \
'git archive --format=zip HEAD >d.zip'
+test_expect_success \
+ 'git archive --format=zip in a bare repo' \
+ '(cd bare.git && git archive --format=zip HEAD) >d1.zip'
+
+test_expect_success \
+ 'git archive --format=zip vs. the same in a bare repo' \
+ 'test_cmp d.zip d1.zip'
+
$UNZIP -v >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 127 ]; then
echo "Skipping ZIP tests, because unzip was not found"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-22 8:42 git archive kenneth johansson
2008-10-22 13:08 ` Deskin Miller
2008-10-22 18:45 ` kenneth johansson
2008-10-22 20:37 ` [RFC PATCH] archive: fix setup to work in bare repositories Deskin Miller
2008-10-22 20:46 ` Jeff King
2008-10-22 21:09 ` Charles Bailey
2008-10-22 21:47 ` [PATCH] Fixed git archive for bare repos Charles Bailey
2008-10-23 1:37 ` Deskin Miller
2008-10-24 22:19 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2008-10-25 15:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Deskin Miller
2008-10-25 19:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-23 15:33 ` git archive Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-10-23 18:21 ` Deskin Miller
2008-10-24 3:58 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49024A05.3090100@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--to=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--cc=charles@hashpling.org \
--cc=deskinm@umich.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ken@kenjo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.