From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 24 - powerpc - build failure with !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:57:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49036C17.1060604@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810251519.57543.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>>>> Hm, looks like this configuration was never buildable -- #ifdef's are missing and wrongly placed. CCing Ben Herrenschmidt...
>>>>>
>>>> What configuration ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> See the subject.
>>>
>> Ah ok. We should probably just remove the option...
>>
>
> Fine with me. Anybody want an easy +1 patch-point? :)
>
BTW, why this option selects BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI?
MBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-25 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-24 6:19 linux-next: Tree for October 24 Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-24 11:38 ` linux-next: Tree for October 24 - powerpc - build failure with !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC Kamalesh Babulal
2008-10-24 12:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-24 22:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-24 22:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-24 23:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-25 13:19 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-25 18:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2008-10-25 19:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-07 14:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-07 14:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 9:05 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-12-08 21:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-12-08 21:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-10-26 0:16 ` linux-next: Tree for October 24 (ACPI) Randy Dunlap
2008-10-26 10:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-26 0:18 ` linux-next: Tree for October 24 (usbip) Randy Dunlap
2008-10-26 5:41 ` Greg KH
2008-10-26 0:21 ` linux-next: Tree for October 24 (ieee80211) Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49036C17.1060604@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.