From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sedji Gaouaou Subject: Re: ASoC: Merging at91 and avr32 dirs - test report Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:57:43 +0100 Message-ID: <49059097.5020309@atmel.com> References: <20081010185312.GA10766@sirena.org.uk> <20081014125835.GF14538@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from atmel-es2.atmel.fr (mail.atmel.fr [81.80.104.162]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C45E246D4 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:57:50 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: ext-jukka.hynninen@vaisala.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@sirena.org.uk List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi, ext-jukka.hynninen@vaisala.com a =E9crit : > Quoting Mark Brown: > = >>> This is propably a false alarm, exactly the same happens with > at91-ssc.c >> OK, so you're happy that the new and old AT91 drivers perform >> equivalently? > = > Life's full of small joys > = >> present in current ASoC. The patch below is *entirely* untested but > may >> help. It needs more thought and (obviously) testing to make sure it's >> safe before it can be merged. > = > Thanks, works like a charm. I'll put the patch on a test. > = > = > -Jukka > _______________________________________________ > Alsa-devel mailing list > Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel > = I am writing to know what is the current status about the at91/avr32 = merging? Is there any progress concerning the testing? What is required for the patch to be accepted? Regards, Sedji