From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Bauer Subject: Re: [VT-D]iommu.c:775: iommu_page_fault: iommu->reg=ffff828bfff57000 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:21:42 +0100 Message-ID: <49077456.7080906@cubewerk.de> References: <4906E4BE.7040102@cubewerk.de><409D32C55C48D34DB5E31C8AB29EB15B071C6AF6@FTLPEXCH05.citrite.net> <49076B07.2010100@cubewerk.de> <409D32C55C48D34DB5E31C8AB29EB15B071C6B27@FTLPEXCH05.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <409D32C55C48D34DB5E31C8AB29EB15B071C6B27@FTLPEXCH05.citrite.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ross Philipson schrieb: > Just out of curiosity, your first email said this: > " Debian Etch 2.6.18.8-xen from xensource.com with Xen 3.3.0 on AMD64." > I am not sure I understand. This is clearly an Intel system as the > output indicates (and esp. since you are using VT-d)? It's correct, the debian guys just called the 64bit port amd64 no matter if its intel or amd. > Could you easily try a newer version of Xen like 3.4? Lots of VT-d > related issues have been fixed in recent months. Not easily but i will give it a try. the unstable branch then? Regards -- stefan