From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: About bio-cgroup Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:32:29 +0530 Message-ID: <490826A5.2050003@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4907C6F6.8040907@cn.fujitsu.com> <20081029.170718.124486817.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20081029172918.71995f7a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Reply-To: balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081029172918.71995f7a.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:07:18 +0900 (JST) > Hirokazu Takahashi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> Hi Ryo, >>> >>> The page_cgroup seems to be stable in the latest kernel. >>> I'd like to know whether you have a plan or schedule to release >>> a new version of bio-cgroup against latest kernel. >> I have a plan on doing this. >> >> I thought I would start to implement it once the implementation of >> memory cgroup got almost done. If you say the code of page_cgroup is >> fixed, I'll start it from now on. I guess it'll be done in two weeks. >> > > code to page_cgroup itself will not be changed. (I hope) > possible change will be > - new flags > - support to SwapCache > - swap_cgroup support (will be done independenly from page_cgroup.) > > API of > lookup_page_cgroup() > lock_page_cgroup() > PCG_USED bit > > will not change, I think. I think you should not wait for stabilization, rather build on mmotm (-mm). Use it and complain if it changes too often or becomes unusable for you. -- Balbir