Re: DPDK observability survey (≈7 min)

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

OK, I suppose that presenting in a DPDK Summit would fit very well.

Thank you


27/10/2025 16:31, Adel Belkhiri:
> Hello Thomas,
> Thank you very much for your comment. What I meant by bare metal was actually on top of the OS, so you are absolutely right that the phrasing was confusing. I’ve reworded the question according to your suggestion.
> Regarding the results, I’m currently preparing an academic paper to submit either to the International Conference on Performance Engineering (ICPE) or the Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS). I also plan to share the results at the next DPDK Summit.
> If you think it would be interesting to share the findings here in the group, I’d be happy to do so―or I can send you a copy of the paper once it’s completed.
> Cheers,
> Adel
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2025 10:06 AM
> To: Adel Belkhiri <adel-2.belkhiri@polymtl.ca>
> Cc: users@dpdk.org <users@dpdk.org>; dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: DPDK observability survey (≈7 min)
> 
> Hello Adel,
> 
> 21/10/2025 16:18, Adel Belkhiri:
> > Quick reminder about our ≈7-minute survey
> > on how you debug and observe DPDK-based applications in real environments.
> >
> > Survey: https://forms.office.com/r/6zRAqxWYKj
> 
> In the question "Runtime environment",
> I suppose "Bare Metal" means just on top of the OS?
> DPDK used to be a real bare metal environment,
> so I suggest rewording this question.
> 
> 
> > This will help guide open-source observability work (Trace Compass analyses)
> > by Polytechnique Montréal, Ericsson Canada, and Ciena.
> 
> Will you share the results here?
> 
> Thank you