From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philip Prindeville Subject: Re: Issues building iptables-1.4.2 w/ linux 2.6.25 (and IMQ) Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:27:25 -0800 Message-ID: <490E1B3D.7030003@redfish-solutions.com> References: <490E111C.9060006@redfish-solutions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from mail.redfish-solutions.com ([66.232.79.143]:39403 "EHLO mail.redfish-solutions.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754070AbYKBV1a (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:27:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sunday 2008-11-02 21:44, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > >> Subject: Issues building iptables-1.4.2 w/ linux 2.6.25 (and IMQ) >> >> I'm trying to build iptables 1.3.8 >> > > Version mismatch. > > >> Is this a known issue? Is there a patch for this? >> > > Yes. (Can't remember.) > > >> I tried bumping to 1.4.2, but that dies with a different issue: >> >> libipt_IMQ.c: In function 'help': >> libipt_IMQ.c:18: error: 'IPTABLES_VERSION' undeclared (first use in this >> function) >> > > IMQ is not packaged in an original iptables tarball, hence this falls > under the IMQ maintainer's care. What you see here is what happens when > you try to use an old patch with a new version. > Ok, so taking this from the other direction: what is the recommended version of iptables to run on Linux 2.6.25.19? -Philip