From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [216.145.245.197] (helo=mx01.dls.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kx2Kf-00055t-3C for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:31:13 +0100 Received: from [209.242.7.188] (helo=[192.168.231.111]) by mx01.dls.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kx0gh-0005ok-JQ for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:45:52 -0600 Message-ID: <490F0E99.6030401@dls.net> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:45:45 -0600 From: "Mike (mwester)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org References: <490BF303.1030701@dls.net> <490E5FAA.9070206@dls.net> <200811031347.08952.zecke@selfish.org> <87ljw1ey5l.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> In-Reply-To: <87ljw1ey5l.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> Subject: Re: [RFC] Re: DISTRO_PR, ipkg dependencies, and meta toolchains... X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:31:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Otavio Salvador wrote: > Holger Freyther writes: > >> On Monday 03 November 2008 03:19:22 Mike (mwester) wrote: >>> Mike (mwester) wrote: >>> >>> (Replying to my own email, and what's worse -- I'm top-posting!) >>> (And I changed the subject line to add [RFC] to get your attention.) >>> >>> I found the problem. Here's a fix: >> eek, otavios and richard went over it. could you please comment? > > It is fixed in current GIT and works fine for me since then... I'm not sure what you are saying here -- I'm using the GIT tip, and the patches I posted are required. It's really quite easy to see -- just do "ar x something-dev.ipk", extract the control file, and look at the dependency -- without the patch I posted, the dependency on package "something" is written with an explicit version number that does not exist, because it does not have the DISTRO_PR on it. Mike (mwester)