From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1KxQgK-0001QS-4x for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:31:12 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KxQgI-0001Po-UM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:31:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KxQgH-0001P7-FO for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:31:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50545 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KxQgH-0001P4-CB for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:31:09 -0500 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:46353 helo=kirsi1.inet.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KxQgH-0004qg-CV for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:31:09 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (84.248.105.254) by kirsi1.inet.fi (8.5.014) id 48FC5AC900CD4957 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:31:08 +0200 Message-ID: <491094ED.8030704@nic.fi> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:31:09 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmVzYSBKw6TDpHNrZWzDpGluZW4=?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <20081102181132.GA24737@thorin> <200811041652.21150.okuji@enbug.org> In-Reply-To: <200811041652.21150.okuji@enbug.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Subject: Re: [PATCH] terminal split X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:31:11 -0000 Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > BTW, I would like to obtain the capability of handling pipes, so that we can, > say, "help | more". I guess you have the same idea in your mind. This should > be trivial, once the input and output are separate, right? I think this would need separated streams design in order to be functional. Not a bad idea as such.... I am wondering the gain however. What kind of implementation plan did you have for piping in example more?