From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
efault@gmx.de, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: tbench wrt. loopback TSO
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:06:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49120AE5.302@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811052108250.9159@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
>>Ignoring the TSO case for a moment, if there is congestion and receiver
>>window available and a user makes a > MSS send that isn't an integral
>>multiple of the MSS, we don't delay the last subMSS segment do we?
>
>
> Without TSO, only Nagle could prevent sending that submss portion, so the
> answer depends on what the window in-flight consists of.
I always thought that Nagle was supposed to be implemented as if it was
on a user send() by user send() basis and not segment by segment, in
which case no send() > MSS would be delayed by Nagle.
rick jones
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-05 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-16 0:14 tbench wrt. loopback TSO David Miller
2008-10-17 3:49 ` non-TCP tbench (was Re: tbench wrt. loopback TSO) David Miller
2008-10-26 12:34 ` tbench wrt. loopback TSO Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-10-27 1:59 ` David Miller
2008-10-27 7:49 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-10-27 14:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-10-27 15:19 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-10-27 17:03 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-10-27 18:39 ` David Miller
2008-10-27 19:35 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-10-27 19:37 ` David Miller
2008-11-05 11:42 ` David Miller
2008-11-05 11:49 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-05 11:54 ` David Miller
2008-11-05 12:04 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-11-05 12:09 ` David Miller
2008-11-05 12:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-11-05 13:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-05 13:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-11-05 18:48 ` Rick Jones
2008-11-05 19:46 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-11-05 21:06 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2008-10-27 22:17 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-10-31 8:14 ` David Miller
2008-10-31 9:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-10-31 9:47 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49120AE5.302@hp.com \
--to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.