From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lachlan McIlroy Subject: Re: linux-next: unable to fetch the xfs tree Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:06:30 +1100 Message-ID: <4913BEC6.6080901@sgi.com> References: <20081107111125.ef33b1dc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081107145332.52d49390.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: lachlan@sgi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:36913 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751265AbYKGEHn (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:07:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081107145332.52d49390.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Chinner , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linuxfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Christoph Hellwig Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:11:25 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> I am getting: >> >> oss.sgi.com[0: 192.48.170.157]: errno=Connection refused >> >> so I will use what I fetched yesterday. > > And now I have received: > > : host cuda-allmx.sgi.com[192.48.176.16] said: 550 > cuda_nsu 5.1.1 ... User unknown (in reply to RCPT > TO command) > > So, is this a permanent state of affairs, or just a temporary glitch? Should be temporary. We have known DNS and email issues that we are working on. We're also moving oss.sgi.com but I have no idea what the schedule is.