From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lachlan McIlroy Subject: Re: linux-next: unable to fetch the xfs tree Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:51:51 +1100 Message-ID: <4913C967.30309@sgi.com> References: <20081107111125.ef33b1dc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081107145332.52d49390.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4913BEC6.6080901@sgi.com> <20081107154602.8621ea3d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: lachlan@sgi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:40874 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751157AbYKGExM (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 23:53:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081107154602.8621ea3d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Chinner , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linuxf-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Christoph Hellwig Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Lachlan, > > On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:06:30 +1100 Lachlan McIlroy wrote: >> Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:11:25 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> I am getting: >>>> >>>> oss.sgi.com[0: 192.48.170.157]: errno=Connection refused >>>> >>>> so I will use what I fetched yesterday. >>> And now I have received: >>> >>> : host cuda-allmx.sgi.com[192.48.176.16] said: 550 >>> cuda_nsu 5.1.1 ... User unknown (in reply to RCPT >>> TO command) >>> >>> So, is this a permanent state of affairs, or just a temporary glitch? >> Should be temporary. We have known DNS and email issues that we are working >> on. We're also moving oss.sgi.com but I have no idea what the schedule is. > > Thanks. > I actually got a bounce message when I sent that reply. Gotta love the irony.