All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>
To: Seokmann Ju <seokmann.ju@qlogic.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	Robert W Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] FC pass through support - revised III
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:30:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4919A4FA.1010707@emulex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E2F6175A-CD38-4216-83E3-6AE78CB078EB@qlogic.com>

fyi - I'm working on a rework IV that genericizes it more, and have been 
talking to Seokman about it.

Don't worry about the patch 1 comments. I've dealt with most of these 
already. But, I'm sure I'll introduce some things that Fujita/Boaz can 
correct for me.

As for the patch2 comments, hold off until you see the IV rework. When 
you revise for the RFC, you can pick them up.

-- james

Seokmann Ju wrote:
> Thanks for the comments, Tomonori.
> As I responded next to each of your comments, I will make changes
> accordingly.
> 
> James, would you want me to send you patch reflecting the changes only?
> Or, if you'd prefer, I will send you another patch contains 'revised
> III + these changes'.
> 
> Please let me know.
> 
> Thank you,
> Seokmann
> 
> On Nov 11, 2008, at 1:41 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:34:35 -0700
>> Seokmann Ju <seokmann.ju@qlogic.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Attachment is also available at the bottom.
>>> ---
>>> From 47f113766853dcabec329013fd1c2eb9e04f8c92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>>> 2001
>>> From: root <root@linux-atl-00.qlogic.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:13:15 -0700
>>> Subject: [PATCH] scsi_transport_fc: FC pass through support
>>>
>>> This patch will add FC pass through support.
>>> The FC pass through support is service request handling mechanism
>>> for FC specification defined services including,
>>> - Link Services (Basic LS, Extended LS)
>>> - Generic Services (FC-CT - Common Transport)
>>> The support utilize BSG (Block layer SCSI Generic) interface with
>>> bidi (bi-directional) nature in handling the service requests.
>>>
>>> This patch added following featues in the support
>>> - FC service structure has defined to transport service requests
>>> - Handles the service request in asynchronous manner - LLD
>>> - Timeout capability
>>> - Abort capability
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Seokmann Ju <seokmann.ju@qlogic.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |  212 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++
>>> ++++++++-
>>>  include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h |   79 ++++++++++++++-
>>>  2 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/
>>> scsi_transport_fc.c
>>> index 1e71abf..a0c1430 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
>>> @@ -43,6 +43,11 @@ static void fc_vport_sched_delete(struct
>>> work_struct *work);
>>>  static int fc_vport_setup(struct Scsi_Host *shost, int channel,
>>>      struct device *pdev, struct fc_vport_identifiers  *ids,
>>>      struct fc_vport **vport);
>>> +static enum blk_eh_timer_return fc_service_timeout(struct request
>>> *req);
>>> +static void fc_service_done(struct fc_service *);
>>> +static int fc_service_handler(struct Scsi_Host *, struct fc_rport *,
>>> +    struct request *, struct request_queue *);
>>> +static void fc_bsg_remove(struct Scsi_Host *, struct fc_rport *);
>>>
>>>  /*
>>>   * Redefine so that we can have same named attributes in the
>>> @@ -2413,11 +2418,214 @@ fc_rport_final_delete(struct work_struct
>>> *work)
>>>
>>>      transport_remove_device(dev);
>>>      device_del(dev);
>>> +    fc_bsg_remove(shost, rport);
>>>      transport_destroy_device(dev);
>>>      put_device(&shost->shost_gendev);       /* for fc_host->rport list */
>>>      put_device(dev);                        /* for self-reference */
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +static enum blk_eh_timer_return fc_service_timeout(struct request
>>> *req)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct fc_service *service = (void *) req->special;
>>> +    struct Scsi_Host *shost = rport_to_shost(service->rport);
>>> +    struct fc_internal *i = to_fc_internal(shost->transportt);
>>> +    unsigned long flags;
>>> +    int res = 0;
>>> +
>>> +    if (service->rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_BLOCKED)
>>> +            return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
>>> +
>>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&service->service_state_lock, flags);
>>> +    if (!(service->service_state_flag & FC_SERVICE_STATE_DONE))
>>> +            service->service_state_flag |= FC_SERVICE_STATE_TIMEOUT;
>>> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&service->service_state_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +    if (i->f->abort_fc_service)
>>> +            res = i->f->abort_fc_service(service);
>>> +
>>> +    if (res) {
>>> +            printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: issuing FC service to the LLD "
>>> +            "failed with status %d\n", res);
>>> +            fc_service_done(service);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* the blk_end_sync_io() doesn't check the error */
>>> +    return BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void fc_service_done(struct fc_service *service)
>>> +{
>>> +
>>> +    if (service->service_state_flag != FC_SERVICE_STATE_DONE) {
>>> +            if (service->service_state_flag == FC_SERVICE_STATE_TIMEOUT)
>>> +                    printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: FC service timed out\n");
>>> +            else if (service->service_state_flag ==
>>> +                FC_SERVICE_STATE_ABORTED)
>>> +                    printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: FC service aborted\n");
>>> +            else
>>> +                    printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: FC service not finished\n");
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (service->srv_reply.status != FC_SERVICE_COMPLETE) {
>>> +            printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: FC service to rport %p failed with"
>>> +                " status 0x%x\n", service->rport,
>>> +                service->srv_reply.status);
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    service->req->errors = service->srv_reply.status;
>>> +
>>> +    blk_end_bidi_request(service->req,
>>> +        service->srv_reply.status ? -EIO : 0, blk_rq_bytes(service-
>>>> req),
>>> +        service->req->next_rq ? blk_rq_bytes(service->req->next_rq) :
>>> 0);
>>> +
>>> +    kfree(service->sg_req);
>>> +    kfree(service->sg_rsp);
>>> +    kfree(service);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int
>>> +issue_fc_service(struct fc_rport *rport, struct request *req,
>>> +    struct request *rsp, struct request_queue *q)
>>> +{
>>> +    int res = -ECOMM;
>>> +    struct fc_service *service;
>>> +    struct Scsi_Host *shost = rport_to_shost(rport);
>>> +    struct fc_internal *i = to_fc_internal(shost->transportt);
>>> +    struct fc_service_request *srv_request = (struct
>>> fc_service_request *)
>>> +        req->cmd;
>>> +
>>> +    service = kzalloc(sizeof(struct fc_service), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> +    if (!service)
>>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +    req->special = service;
>>> +    service->rport = rport;
>>> +    service->req = req;
>>> +    service->q = q;
>>> +    service->srv_request = srv_request;
>>> +
>>> +    service->sg_req =
>>> +        kzalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * req->nr_phys_segments,
>>> +        GFP_KERNEL);
>> Needs to check the allocation failure.
> OK. checker will be added.
>>
>>
>>> +    sg_init_table(service->sg_req, req->nr_phys_segments);
>>> +    service->req_sg_cnt =
>>> +        blk_rq_map_sg(q, req, service->sg_req);
>>> +    service->req_size = req->data_len;
>>> +
>>> +    service->sg_rsp =
>>> +        kzalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * rsp->nr_phys_segments,
>>> +        GFP_KERNEL);
>> Ditto.
> OK.
>>
>>
>>> +    sg_init_table(service->sg_rsp, rsp->nr_phys_segments);
>>> +    service->rsp_sg_cnt =
>>> +        blk_rq_map_sg(q, rsp, service->sg_rsp);
>>> +    service->rsp_size = rsp->data_len;
>>> +
>>> +    /* sense area of the request structure */
>>> +    service->reply_seq = req->sense;
>>> +    service->service_done = fc_service_done;
>>> +    service->service_state_flag = FC_SERVICE_STATE_PENDING;
>>> +
>>> +    if (i->f->execute_fc_service)
>>> +            res = i->f->execute_fc_service(service);
>>> +
>>> +    if (res) {
>>> +            printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: issuing FC service to the LLD "
>>> +            "failed with status %d\n", res);
>>> +            fc_service_done(service);
>>> +            return res;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int
>>> +fc_service_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct fc_rport *rport,
>>> +                      struct request *req, struct request_queue *q)
>>> +{
>>> +    int ret;
>>> +    struct request *rsp = req->next_rq;
>>> +
>>> +    if (!rsp) {
>>> +            printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: space for a FC service"
>>> +               " response is missing\n");
>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> Needs to complete the request unless the request leaks, I think.
> You are right. There are some other places where need to be fixed as
> well.
> 
>>
>>
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    ret = issue_fc_service(rport, req, rsp, q);
>>> +
>>> +    return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void fc_service_dispatch(struct request_queue *q)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct request *req;
>>> +    struct fc_rport *rport = q->queuedata;
>>> +    struct Scsi_Host *shost = rport_to_shost(rport);
>>> +
>>> +    while (!blk_queue_plugged(q)) {
>>> +            req = elv_next_request(q);
>>> +            if (!req)
>>> +                    break;
>>> +
>>> +            blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
>>> +            spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>>> +
>>> +            fc_service_handler(shost, rport, req, q);
>>> +
>>> +            spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>>> +    }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int
>>> +fc_bsg_initialize(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct fc_rport *rport)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct request_queue *q;
>>> +    int error;
>>> +    struct device *dev;
>>> +    const char *name;
>>> +    void (*release)(struct device *);
>> Not necessary.
>>
>>
>>> +    if (!rport) {
>>> +            printk(KERN_ERR "ERROR: rport is NULL\n");
>>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    q = blk_init_queue(fc_service_dispatch, NULL);
>>> +    if (!q)
>>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> +    dev = &rport->dev;
>>> +    name = dev->bus_id;
>>> +    release = NULL;
>>> +
>>> +    error = bsg_register_queue(q, dev, name, release);
>> You can just use NULL here.
>>
>>
>>       error = bsg_register_queue(q, dev, name, NULL);
> OK.
>>
>>
>>> +    if (error) {
>>> +            blk_cleanup_queue(q);
>>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    blk_queue_max_hw_segments(q, shost->sg_tablesize);
>>> +    blk_queue_max_phys_segments(q, SCSI_MAX_SG_CHAIN_SEGMENTS);
>>> +    blk_queue_rq_timed_out(q, fc_service_timeout);
>>> +    blk_queue_rq_timeout(q, BLK_DEFAULT_SG_TIMEOUT);
>>> +
>>> +    rport->q = q;
>>> +    q->queuedata = rport;
>>> +    queue_flag_set_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_BIDI, q);
>>> +
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void
>>> +fc_bsg_remove(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct fc_rport *rport)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct request_queue *q = rport->q;
>>> +
>>> +    if (!q)
>>> +            return;
>>> +
>>> +    bsg_unregister_queue(q);
>>> +}
>>>
>>>  /**
>>>   * fc_rport_create - allocates and creates a remote FC port.
>>> @@ -2478,8 +2686,8 @@ fc_rport_create(struct Scsi_Host *shost, int
>>> channel,
>>>      else
>>>              rport->scsi_target_id = -1;
>>>      list_add_tail(&rport->peers, &fc_host->rports);
>>> -    get_device(&shost->shost_gendev);       /* for fc_host->rport list */
>>>
>>> +    get_device(&shost->shost_gendev);       /* for fc_host->rport list */
>>>      spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
>>>
>>>      dev = &rport->dev;
>>> @@ -2498,6 +2706,8 @@ fc_rport_create(struct Scsi_Host *shost, int
>>> channel,
>>>      transport_add_device(dev);
>>>      transport_configure_device(dev);
>>>
>>> +    fc_bsg_initialize(shost, rport);
>>> +
>>>      if (rport->roles & FC_PORT_ROLE_FCP_TARGET) {
>>>              /* initiate a scan of the target */
>>>              rport->flags |= FC_RPORT_SCAN_PENDING;
>>> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h b/include/scsi/
>>> scsi_transport_fc.h
>>> index 49d8913..8367d48 100644
>>> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
>>> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
>>> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
>>>
>>>  struct scsi_transport_template;
>>>
>>> -
>>>  /*
>>>   * FC Port definitions - Following FC HBAAPI guidelines
>>>   *
>>> @@ -352,6 +351,7 @@ struct fc_rport {        /* aka fc_starget_attrs */
>>>      struct delayed_work fail_io_work;
>>>      struct work_struct stgt_delete_work;
>>>      struct work_struct rport_delete_work;
>>> +    struct request_queue *q;
>>>  } __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(unsigned long))));
>>>
>>>  /* bit field values for struct fc_rport "flags" field: */
>>> @@ -515,6 +515,78 @@ struct fc_host_attrs {
>>>      struct workqueue_struct *devloss_work_q;
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +#define FC_STATUS_BUF_SIZE 96
>>> +
>>> +enum fc_frame_type {
>>> +    FC_FRAME_TYPE_BS,
>>> +    FC_FRAME_TYPE_ELS,
>>> +    FC_FRAME_TYPE_IEC = 4,
>>> +    FC_FRAME_TYPE_IP,
>>> +    FC_FRAME_TYPE_FCP = 8,
>>> +    FC_FRAME_TYPE_GPP,
>>> +    FC_FRAME_TYPE_FC_CT = 0x20,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +enum fc_service_status {
>>> +    FC_SERVICE_COMPLETE,
>>> +    FC_SERVICE_TIMEOUT,
>>> +    FC_SERVICE_ABORT,
>>> +    FC_SERVICE_UNSUPPORTED,
>>> +    FC_SERVICE_ERROR = -1,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#define FC_SERVICE_STATE_PENDING      1
>>> +#define FC_SERVICE_STATE_DONE         2
>>> +#define FC_SERVICE_STATE_ABORTED      4
>>> +#define FC_SERVICE_STATE_TIMEOUT      8
>>> +
>>> +#define FC_SERVICE_TIMEOUT 10
>>> +
>>> +/* request (CDB) structure of the sg_io_v4 */
>>> +struct fc_service_request {
>>> +    u8   request_type;
>>> +    u8   reserved0;
>>> +    u8   reserved1;
>>> +    u8   reserved2;
>>> +    u32  reserved3[3];
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/* response  (request sense data) structure of the sg_io_v4 */
>>> +struct fc_service_reply {
>>> +    enum fc_service_status status;
>>> +    u16  error_code;
>>> +    u16  additional_error_code;
>>> +    u32  residual;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct fc_service {
>>> +    struct fc_rport  *rport;
>>> +    struct list_head list;
>>> +
>>> +    spinlock_t   service_state_lock;
>>> +    unsigned     service_state_flag;
>>> +
>>> +    struct request *req;
>>> +    struct request_queue *q;
>>> +
>>> +    /* Used by the discovery code. */
>>> +    struct completion  completion;
>>> +
>>> +    struct fc_service_request *srv_request;
>>> +    struct scatterlist *sg_req;
>>> +    int   req_sg_cnt;
>>> +    int   req_size;
>>> +    struct scatterlist *sg_rsp;
>>> +    int   rsp_sg_cnt;
>>> +    int   rsp_size;
>>> +
>>> +    struct fc_service_reply srv_reply;
>>> +    void  *reply_seq;   /* pointer to sense area of request */
>>> +    void  (*service_done)(struct fc_service *);
>>> +
>>> +    void *lld_pkt;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  #define shost_to_fc_host(x) \
>>>      ((struct fc_host_attrs *)(x)->shost_data)
>>>
>>> @@ -613,6 +685,10 @@ struct fc_function_template {
>>>      int     (* tsk_mgmt_response)(struct Scsi_Host *, u64, u64, int);
>>>      int     (* it_nexus_response)(struct Scsi_Host *, u64, int);
>>>
>>> +    /* fc service handler */
>>> +    int     (*execute_fc_service)(struct fc_service *);
>>> +    int     (*abort_fc_service)(struct fc_service *);
>>> +
>>>      /* allocation lengths for host-specific data */
>>>      u32                             dd_fcrport_size;
>>>      u32                             dd_fcvport_size;
>>> @@ -736,7 +812,6 @@ fc_vport_set_state(struct fc_vport *vport, enum
>>> fc_vport_state new_state)
>>>      vport->vport_state = new_state;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -
>>>  struct scsi_transport_template *fc_attach_transport(
>>>                      struct fc_function_template *);
>>>  void fc_release_transport(struct scsi_transport_template *);
>>> --
>>> 1.6.0.2
>>>
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2008-11-11 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-31 15:34 [PATCH 1/2] FC pass through support - revised III Seokmann Ju
2008-11-11  9:41 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-11-11 14:35   ` Seokmann Ju
2008-11-11 15:30     ` James Smart [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4919A4FA.1010707@emulex.com \
    --to=james.smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=robert.w.love@intel.com \
    --cc=seokmann.ju@qlogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.