From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chris Friesen" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:31:39 -0600 Message-ID: <4919DD9B.1070104@nortel.com> References: <20081111142323.28477.41235.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Received: from zcars04f.nortel.com ([47.129.242.57]:55353 "EHLO zcars04f.nortel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751012AbYKKTbs (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:31:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081111142323.28477.41235.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Gregory Haskins wrote: > Hi Ingo, Steven, Peter, > This series applies roughly to mainline as an enhancement to the sched_rt > logic. Peter and I were discussing some of the unecessary overhead in > pull_rt_tasks() via IRC, and this is my RFC attempt to address the problem. > > I have built/booted this on a 4-way C2D Xeon box and it passes preempt-test. At first blush it looks reasonable, but do you have any performance numbers? Chris