Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: free all at rmdir

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:07:58 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> If we do this then we can make the above "keep" behaviour non-optional,
>> and the operator gets to choose whether or not to drop the caches
>> before doing the rmdir.
>>
>> Plus, we get a new per-memcg drop_caches capability.  And it's a nicer
>> interface, and it doesn't have the obvious races which on_rmdir has,
>> etc.
>>
>> hm?
>>
> 
> Balbir, how would you want to do ?
> 
> I planned to post shrink_uage patch later (it's easy to be implemented) regardless
> of acceptance of this patch.
> 
> So, I think we should add shrink_usage now and drop this is a way to go.

I am a bit concerned about dropping stuff at will later. Ubuntu 8.10 has memory
controller enabled and we exposed memory.force_empty interface there and now
we've dropped it (bad on our part). I think we should have deprecated it and
dropped it later.

> I think I can prepare patch soon. But I'd like to push handle-swap-cache patch
> before introducing shrink_usage. 
> 
> Then, posting following 2 patch for this week is my current intention.
>  [1/2] handle swap cache
>  [2/2] shrink_usage patch (instead of this patch)
> 
> Objection ?

No.. just be wary of breaking API, please!

-- 
	Balbir