From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <491D39E8.3090105@domain.hid> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:42:16 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51CAD0CE1504444DBE77CBBE51A0135D533259@domain.hid> <490F2F23.2080307@domain.hid> <67b6b3430811031237v4cfba0c9sf63e40a697f3da58@domain.hid> <49100825.9000502@domain.hid> <4915C4D3.8030304@domain.hid> <67b6b3430811101607k75eaa084ga387c453096d2710@domain.hid> <1c74c6152ff1b52eaa3dd84f4b912b29.squirrel@domain.hid> <51CAD0CE1504444DBE77CBBE51A0135D53344A@slcmail.slc.mew.int> <67b6b3430811111432o1ca14e87w7ccab4ab95dd591e@domain.hid> <491C0B50.6030507@domain.hid> <67b6b3430811131959r6bc22545wd4e3df613c15fc7b@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <67b6b3430811131959r6bc22545wd4e3df613c15fc7b@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] fpu context switch issue List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Mark Saiia Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Mark Saiia wrote: > Gilles, > > No noticeable difference using 2.4.5 w/ 2.6.26.3. I was testing using the > app we first noticed the behavior on. I will run the simple test program > tomorrow, but fully expect to see the erroneous behavior. I also had the > chance to test the patch on a GX1 board, and noticed the error as well. We > have a version of the app, that I was testing today, running on 2.6.23.12 w/ > Xenomai svn of around February 2008 (I don't have the revision number in > front of me at the moment) that works properly. Could you test 2.6.23 with Xenomai 2.4.5? This way we would know if we are looking for a problem in the I-pipe patch or in Xenomai. -- Gilles.