From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: speedup dst_release()
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:04:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491D3F18.5030505@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081114.005437.09284570.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:09:31 +0100
>
>> During tbench/oprofile sessions, I found that dst_release() was in third position.
> ...
>> Instead of first checking the refcount value, then decrement it,
>> we use atomic_dec_return() to help CPU to make the right memory transaction
>> (ie getting the cache line in exclusive mode)
> ...
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
>
> This looks great, applied, thanks Eric.
>
Thanks David
I think I understood some regressions here on 32bits
offsetof(struct dst_entry, __refcnt) is 0x7c again !!!
This is really really bad for performance
I believe this comes from a patch from Alexey Dobriyan
(commit def8b4faff5ca349beafbbfeb2c51f3602a6ef3a
net: reduce structures when XFRM=n)
This kills effort from Zhang Yanmin (and me...)
(commit f1dd9c379cac7d5a76259e7dffcd5f8edc697d17
[NET]: Fix tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1)
Really we must find something so that this damned __refcnt is starting at 0x80
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-14 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-14 8:09 [PATCH] net: speedup dst_release() Eric Dumazet
2008-11-14 8:54 ` David Miller
2008-11-14 9:04 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-11-14 9:36 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-11-14 10:47 ` [PATCH] net: make sure struct dst_entry refcount is aligned on 64 bytes Eric Dumazet
2008-11-14 11:35 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-11-14 11:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-11-14 13:22 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-11-14 13:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-11-17 3:46 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491D3F18.5030505@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.