diff for duplicates of <49219D36.5020801@cosmosbay.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index d7c3906..4e88914 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Ingo Molnar a écrit : -> * Eric Dumazet <dada1-fPLkHRcR87vqlBn2x/YWAg@public.gmane.org> wrote: +> * Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote: > >>> It all looks like pure old-fashioned straight overhead in the >>> networking layer to me. Do we still touch the same global cacheline diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index d41a1a2..4441cec 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,24 +5,23 @@ "ref\020081117110119.GL28786@elte.hu\0" "ref\04921539B.2000002@cosmosbay.com\0" "ref\020081117161135.GE12081@elte.hu\0" - "ref\020081117161135.GE12081-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Eric Dumazet <dada1-fPLkHRcR87vqlBn2x/YWAg@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from\t2.6.22 -> 2.6.28\0" "Date\0Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:35:02 +0100\0" - "To\0Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>" - rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org - linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org - efault-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org - a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org - Linus Torvalds <torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> - " Stephen Hemminger <shemminger-ZtmgI6mnKB3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" + "To\0Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>\0" + "Cc\0David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>" + rjw@sisk.pl + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org + cl@linux-foundation.org + efault@gmx.de + a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl + Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> + " Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Ingo Molnar a \303\251crit :\n" - "> * Eric Dumazet <dada1-fPLkHRcR87vqlBn2x/YWAg@public.gmane.org> wrote:\n" + "> * Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:\n" "> \n" ">>> It all looks like pure old-fashioned straight overhead in the \n" ">>> networking layer to me. Do we still touch the same global cacheline \n" @@ -72,4 +71,4 @@ "Another contended cache line is the rwlock in iptables.\n" I remember Stephen had a patch to make the thing use RCU. -e009d0d8ec03e79f6d3d7d983b08b6cd74ba7d278b927673e757bd72b8dc039b +374ab43f3c6082ac67bc12480633adbc133031d25a8b62ef10accad69e38cd63
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.