From: Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>
To: Farkas Levente <lfarkas@lfarkas.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Uri Lublin <ulublin@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: can we hope a stable version in the near future?
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:23:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49242F68.9030400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4923E380.6050307@lfarkas.org>
Farkas Levente wrote:
> Dor Laor wrote:
>
>>>>> on the other hand the real question are you plan to somehow stabilize
>>>>> any of the following release in the near future? in the last 1.5 years
>>>>> we wait for this. or you currently not recommend and not plan to use
>>>>> kvm
>>>>> in production? it's also an option but would be useful to know. in this
>>>>> case we (and probably many others) switch to xen, virtualbox, vmware or
>>>>> anything else as a virtualization platform.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> kvm is used in production on several products. Just not the kvm-nn
>>>> releases I make. The production versions of kvm are backed by testing,
>>>> which makes all the difference. Slapping a 'stable' label over a
>>>> release doesn't make it so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> there are many open source project which has stable and devel
>>> versions:-) actually almost all projects have a stable release along
>>> with the devel version. but kvm has not any in the last few years,
>>> that's why i think it's high time to stabilize 'a' version ie. frozen
>>> feature list and fix all known bugs.
>>>
>>>
>> You're right about the need for stable release, that's the idea of the
>> 'maint' branches.
>> maint/2.6.26 for both kernel and userspace is stable (using userspace
>> irqchip).
>> Now we'll stabilize another user/kernel pair based on 2.6.28
>>
>
> that's a good news:-)
> but does this means there will be a new kvm-x.y.z release and i can
> build the userspace from it _and_ build a kmod for eg. the latest
> rhel-5's kernel-2.6.18-92.1.18.el5? ie. i'll be able to install it on
> rhel-5 a kvm and kvm-kmod and it'll work? or it'll just run on the not
> even released 2.6.28 kernel?
> and what is the relationship between maint release and kvm-nn and the
> next stable release?
> is there a tarball for the current maint release? and the same question
> here can i build a kmod and userspace from that for rhel-5?
>
>
As always you'll have the option of using kvm as a kernel module.
So even if the stable branch is based on 2.6.28, you can always take the
kvm bits through 'make -C kernel sync LINUX=PATH' in the userspace.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-19 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-09 21:13 can we hope a stable version in the near future? Farkas Levente
2008-11-10 6:27 ` Brian Jackson
2008-11-10 10:29 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-10 10:49 ` Farkas Levente
2008-11-16 16:14 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-18 22:07 ` Farkas Levente
2008-11-19 9:40 ` Dor Laor
2008-11-19 9:59 ` Farkas Levente
2008-11-19 15:23 ` Dor Laor [this message]
2008-11-10 11:01 ` Martin Maurer
2008-11-10 11:31 ` Farkas Levente
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49242F68.9030400@redhat.com \
--to=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lfarkas@lfarkas.org \
--cc=ulublin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.