Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>> Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote: >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:randy.dunlap@oracle.com] >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:40 PM >>>>>> To: scsi >>>>>> Cc: Jens Axboe; Miller, Mike (OS Dev); James Bottomley; lkml; akpm >>>>>> Subject: Re: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:33:07 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 04 2008, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0x3bb2 : mov 0x2(%r8),%dx >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0x3bb7 : test %dx,%dx >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0x3bba : je 0x3f0e >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $ addr2line -e cciss.o -f do_cciss_intr+0x627 SA5_fifo_full >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> /home/rdunlap/linsrc/linux-2.6.27-rc3-git7/drivers/block/cciss.h:2 >>>>>>>>>> 06 >>>>>>>>>>>> OK ...that's confusing. It seems to be saying that >>>>>> ctrlr_info_t >>>>>>>>>>>> * was NULL. However, I can't see a way of getting into the >>>>>>>>>> fifo_full >>>>>>>>>>>> callback from do_cciss_intr .. >>>>>>>>>>>> especially not with an NULL host. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> James >>>>>>>>>>> That is weird. Even if we could get there fifo_full doesn't >>>>>>>>>> do anything but wait for a bit. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This just happened again. This time it's on 2.6.27-rc5-git3. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ~Randy >>>>>>>>> Thanks Randy. I think. :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll try to recreate in my lab. >>>>>>>> This looks somewhat strange, mostly like 'c' is NULL and it's >>>>>>>> oopsing in in removeQ (I don't think Randy's analysis is >>>>>> correct in >>>>>>>> assuming it's 'h' and it's in fifo_full). Given that 'c' >>>>>> cannot be >>>>>>>> NULL, it's c->prev or c->next that are NULL. >>>> This BUG: has happened (now) 5 times today. Higher frequency than usual for >>>> some reason. >>>> >>>> I enabled CCISS_DEBUG and added one printk in removeQ(). On the first call >>> s/first/second/ >>> >>> >>>> to removeQ(), both c->next and c->prev are NULL. >>>> >>>> Here's the kernel log output from cciss: >> I added a printk() in addQ() as well. Here's the new output: >> >> HP CISS Driver (v 3.6.20) >> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] enabled at IRQ 54 >> cciss 0000:42:08.0: PCI INT A -> Link[LNKA] -> GSI 54 (level, high) -> IRQ 54 >> command = 147 >> irq = 36 >> board_id = 3211103c >> cciss 0000:42:08.0: irq 87 for MSI/MSI-X >> address 0 = fdf80000 >> cfg base address = 10 >> cfg base address index = 0 >> cfg offset = 400 >> Controller Configuration information >> ------------------------------------ >> Signature = CISS >> Spec Number = 1 >> Transport methods supported = 0x6 >> Transport methods active = 0x3 >> Requested transport Method = 0x0 >> Coalesce Interrupt Delay = 0x0 >> Coalesce Interrupt Count = 0x1 >> Max outstanding commands = 0x256 >> Bus Types = 0x200000 >> Server Name = >> Heartbeat Counter = 0x1672 >> >> >> Trying to put board into Simple mode >> I counter got to 1 0 >> Controller Configuration information >> ------------------------------------ >> Signature = CISS >> Spec Number = 1 >> Transport methods supported = 0x6 >> Transport methods active = 0x3 >> Requested transport Method = 0x0 >> Coalesce Interrupt Delay = 0x0 >> Coalesce Interrupt Count = 0x1 >> Max outstanding commands = 0x256 >> Bus Types = 0x200000 >> Server Name = >> Heartbeat Counter = 0x1672 >> >> >> cciss0: <0x3238> at PCI 0000:42:08.0 IRQ 87 using DAC >> cciss: intr_pending 8 >> cciss: addQ: Qptr=ffff88027e0100b8, c=ffff88007f83e000 >> cciss: removeQ: Qptr=ffff88027e0100b8, c=ffff88007f83e000, next=ffff88007f83e000, prev=ffff88007f83e000 >> Sending 7f83e000 - down to controller >> cciss: addQ: Qptr=ffff88027e0100c0, c=ffff88007f83e000 >> cciss: intr_pending 8 >> cciss: Read 4 back from board >> cciss: removeQ: Qptr=ffff88027e0100c0, c=ffff88007f840000, next=0000000000000000, prev=0000000000000000 >> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000248 > > Randy, can you post the debug patch you used? The above goes boom when Sure. I have 2 patches. One is a fix for CCISS_DEBUG printk formats that I posted to linux-scsi yesterday. The other just adds more debug code. > it attempts to remove a command that isn't on the list, the Qptr in the > last example should be empty, hence the oops. So I'd be interested in > seeing what removeQ() calls this is, I'm assuming it's this bit in > do_cciss_intr(): > > ... > while (c->busaddr != a) { > c = c->next; > if (c == h->cmpQ) > break; > } > } > /* > * If we've found the command, take it off the > * completion Q and free it > */ > if (c->busaddr == a) { > removeQ(&h->cmpQ, c); > if (c->cmd_type == CMD_RWREQ) { > complete_command(h, c, 0); > ... > > If so, what part of the c lookup are you hitting - the on that does: > > c = h->cmd_pool + a2; > > or the c->busaddr check that his shown above? I don't know that the patch will tell us which call it is. The added code is inside removeQ() and addQ(), not near the calls to them. -- ~Randy