From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: RE: poweroff in 3.2 and 3.3 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:31:27 +0000 Message-ID: <49252E6F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> References: <49242037.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <0A882F4D99BBF6449D58E61AAFD7EDD601E23B3F@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <49252B4B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <0A882F4D99BBF6449D58E61AAFD7EDD601E23B4B@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0A882F4D99BBF6449D58E61AAFD7EDD601E23B4B@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Kevin Tian Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , 'Keir Fraser' List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> "Tian, Kevin" 20.11.08 09:19 >>> >>But my point is that this is wrong (no matter how it's=20 >>worded): entering >>S5 also uses this path, and in that case there's nothing that stops >>non-current vCPU-s of dom0. > >I see. You're right. But that seems not matter as you're doing S5. :-) See my other reply just sent to Keir's similar question. Jan