From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <49256843.1090303@domain.hid> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:38:11 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200811190056.12595.berlemont.hauw@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <200811190056.12595.berlemont.hauw@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Unstable driver integration policy List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexis Berlemont Cc: xenomai-core Hi Alexis, Alexis Berlemont wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to find a way to populate the Comedi drivers set. > > However, I am stuck by a simple fact: I have no acquisition board to validate > a least driver... > > Starting from here, I am trying to find out what should be the proper method > to provide non-validated drivers to anybody inclined to test them. > > Do you think creating a specific subversion branch for this stuff would be a > good idea ? Given the well-known fact that (too) few people look beyond what we deliver as releases and also assuming that your drivers should have no side-effects (unless when actually used), I would rather suggest to develop for SVN head, merge and deliver, but mark each driver "experimental" until people with real hw confirm that it works as expected. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 ES-OS Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux