From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@intel.com>,
"Yang, Sheng" <sheng.yang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix race between pending IRQ and NMI
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:04:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492687BE.9030307@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49256D38.4090908@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> The nmi handler could change the tpr to mask the preempted interrupt;
>>> but the code would not notice that. Once the interrupt was injected the
>>> guest would see an interrupt at a higher priority than it has programmed
>>> the hardware to allow.
>>>
>>
>> I consider this a bit far fetch. What sane NMI handler would fiddle with
>> the APIC? It would be fairly tricky to properly synchronize this with
>> the rest of the OS.
>>
>
> Sure, this is not a realistic guest.
>
>>> Basically, once we commit to an interrupt via kvm_cpu_get_interrupt(),
>>> we must inject it before the any instruction gets executed.
>>>
>>> I don't think any real guest would notice, though.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, I have no problems with your approach (when also applied on the
>> user space irqchip path) of keeping the order *if* we can ensure that
>> only the first instruction of the IRQ handler is executed and we will
>> then inject the NMI. Otherwise this opens a prio inversion between IRQs
>> and NMIs. The point is that, unless I'm overseeing some detail right
>> now, your approach will inject the pending NMI only once the guest
>> /happens/ to exit the VM, right? If yes, then it's a no-go IMHO, also
>> for keeping this property with the queue approach.
>>
>
> enable_nmi_window() should cause an exit once the interrupt has been
> injected (likely before the first interrupt handler instruction was
> executed, but after the stack frame was created). So the nmi will not
> be delayed.
Right now, you only call enable_nmi_window() if that window is currently
closed - and that's not the common case I'm worried about.
>
> But I think I see a bigger issue - if we inject an regular interrupt
> while another is pending, then we will encounter this problem. Looks
> like we have to enable the interrupt window after injecting an interrupt
> if there are still pending interrupts.
Yeah, probably. I'm just wondering now if we can set
exit-on-interrupt-window while the vcpu state is interruptible (ie.
_before_ the injection). There is some entry check like this for NMIs,
but maybe no for interrupts. Need to check.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2 ES-OS
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-21 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-10 15:52 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix race between pending IRQ and NMI Jan Kiszka
2008-11-16 12:29 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-16 14:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-16 15:15 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-16 15:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-19 17:38 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-19 21:28 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-20 13:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-20 13:59 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-21 10:04 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-11-21 11:14 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-22 12:25 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-24 9:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-11-25 14:45 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-25 14:55 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492687BE.9030307@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=jiajun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sheng.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.