From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [87.193.137.78] (helo=mail.extern.dresearch.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L3Xr4-0001yQ-5o for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:23:34 +0100 Received: from consult.extern.dresearch.de (consult.extern.DResearch.DE [87.193.137.68]) by mail.extern.dresearch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A40E16DF7B for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:29:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from hiob.intern.dresearch.de (unknown [87.193.137.50]) by consult.extern.dresearch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EA62A4145 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:20:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.24.0.58] ([10.24.0.58]) by hiob.intern.dresearch.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:20:57 +0100 Message-ID: <4926D1D1.6030204@dresearch.de> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:20:49 +0100 From: Steffen Sledz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2008 15:20:57.0964 (UTC) FILETIME=[C107AAC0:01C94BEC] Subject: Re: Revert "busybox: Disable busybox shadow support for Angstrom" X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:23:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Koen Kooi wrote: > Graeme and I reverted "busybox: Disable busybox shadow support for > Angstrom", the commit message explains it: > > "Revert "busybox: Disable busybox shadow support for Angstrom" Mea culpa! Mea maxima culpa! My fault. I will write down the new committers instructions 100 times as penalty. OK? But back to the problem. It was reportet as bug 4808 (see http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4808) on November the 6th. Busybox 1.11.3 for Angstrom is build with shadow support, but Angstrom does not install /etc/shadow. This results in problems when calling the passwd command. Earlier busybox versions do not enable shadow support for Angstrom. I see two possible solutions: 1. the patch i committed illegaly 2. install /etc/shadow and fully support it (i believe ther is something more to do here) Regards, Steffen